GRIDREADY

Readiness verification · European energy projects

Ready to permit, connect and finance. Proven, not claimed.

Europe has far more energy projects asking for a grid connection than its grids can serve. The projects that move are the ones that can show they are ready. GridReady screens a site in seconds and builds the evidence behind that answer, so readiness becomes something you can verify rather than assert.

Methodology

01 · Screen

A readiness score in seconds

Enter a site and get a scored screening built from public government data:

  • grid capacity
  • land
  • environment
  • permits

Every input is traceable to its source, and anything unknown is shown as unknown, never papered over.

02 · Evidence

A dossier you can check

A deeper pass reads the primary documents, permit notices and case law, into claims that quote their sources word for word, then drafts a site memo in which every sentence carries a citation you can follow.

Inside step 02, the deep run walks its stages. A recording of the real thing, looped.

03 · Countersign

A named reviewer signs

Models read documents and draft text. They never decide the score. Before any dossier is called verified, a named human reviewer checks the claims and countersigns, and the dossier records who signed and when.

Three sites, screened for real

Three real Dutch battery-storage sites, curated one per grid operator and screened by the same engine you can run yourself. Worked examples, not customer results: the same address gives the same score for anyone. Open any card for the full screening.

Delfzijl · Groningen · Enexis

READY is the second of the five bands. The position is strong, with a small number of items still to close rather than a gap in the case itself. Where the bands cut.

A 30 MW battery on the Chemiepark, with ownership verified at the Kadaster, a permit application filed and every appeal study done. Grid congestion is the binding constraint, and the score says so instead of hiding it.

Deep dossier countersigned and published · 28 claims

Open the Delfzijl screening →
Zeewolde · Flevoland · Liander

CONDITIONAL is the middle of the five bands. The site is viable but not yet provable: at least one criterion still depends on work that has not happened or evidence that is not on the public record. Where the bands cut.

A 50 MW battery at Trekkersveld, with land under an eight-year option and zoning read as allowing storage, but the permit still at pre-application. The screening lists what would move it, in the order that moves it most.

Screening published · no deep dossier yet

Open the Zeewolde screening →
Botlek · Rotterdam · Stedin

EARLY is the fourth of the five bands. Material readiness work remains, and the score reflects how much of the case is still missing rather than anything being wrong with the site. Where the bands cut.

A 40 MW battery in the Botlek port area, on a two-year exclusivity covering part of the parcel, with zoning silent and no studies yet. An early-stage site, scored as one.

Screening published · no deep dossier yet

Open the Botlek screening →

How the score stays honest

  • Humans sign. Models never score. The score is computed by code from a versioned rubric. Models read documents and draft prose, and a named reviewer countersigns before any dossier is called verified.
  • Unknown is displayed, never guessed. A criterion the public record cannot answer drops out of the average, and the coverage figure falls with it.
  • Every fact carries its source. Each data layer names its source, licence and retrieval time, and every claim a model extracts quotes the document it came from, word for word.

The rubric's weights, bands and evidence multipliers are published. Read how it works in full, or fetch the raw methodology at /api/methodology and check our working. Next on the roadmap: a guided chat about your own screening and the evidence that would improve it. The score stays deterministic throughout.

Built first for battery storage and grid connections in the Netherlands, for the developers who need to prove readiness, the lenders who need to trust it, and the grid operators who need to prioritise by it.

Five design-partner slots

GridReady is being built with a handful of design partners rather than in front of a silent market. Five slots, and they close when the fifth signs.

Partners get

  • Founding pricing, locked for three years
  • A direct line into the roadmap
  • Priority expert-review capacity
  • Project data ring-fenced, with contractual confidentiality

We ask for

  • Real usage on real sites
  • Honest feedback
  • Rights to anonymised outcome data

Interested? Join the waiting list below and pick "design partner" as your role.

Join the waiting list

GridReady is in development, with a working prototype. Leave an address and we will write when it opens to new users, and about material changes on the way there. Nothing else.

We keep the address, and the role and organisation if you add them, until you ask to be removed. One email to privacy@gridready.eu does it, and the privacy notice has the detail.

Prefer email? Write to hello@gridready.eu.